* This is the modus mailing list *

Hi Cary and Lapo,

This may be explained by the fact that this virus is blocked by a new virus
definition.  If, for any reason, your AV definitions were out of
synchronization with Vircom's it is possible that we were blocking it while
you weren't.

For example, any temporary network connectivity problem with the Vircom
auto-update site or a too long AV auto-update frequency would explain this.

As of this moment, if you have the latest update (use the Update Now button)
your system should block this particular virus.  If it does not, I recommend
you contact support immediately.

Regards,

-------------------------------------
Micha�l Gaudette, P.Eng., M.B.A.
Product Manager
Vircom Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lapo Nustrini
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 11:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Modus] Fw: You sent potentially unsafe content: 
> Spam and VIRUS
> 
> 
> * This is the modus mailing list *
> 
> Hello Cary,
> I had the exact same experience.
> did you receive an answer from Vircom as to why it got through your 
> filters (and ours), but not Vircom's own?
> 
> Thanks,
> Lapo
> 
> 
> On Jan 24, 2004, at 5:13 AM, Cary Fitch wrote:
> 
> > �
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Cary Fitch
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent:Saturday, January 24, 2004 6:48 AM
> > Subject: Fw: You sent potentially unsafe content: Spam and VIRUS
> >
> > I "sent as an attachment" an email I received, to Spamtrap3, which I
> > knew was a fake "Security Center Announcement", puportably from 
> > Microsoft.� It had some active-x content, which my browser 
> blocks, and 
> > my browser said "it might not display properly because I 
> was blocking 
> > active-x".
> > �
> > I sent it because it was spam and I received it,� and if others
> > received it they might be tempted to download the claimed 
> patch, which 
> > would really be a virus.� However, I got back the below 
> message from 
> > Vircom.� My question would be "Why I got the message from 
> them but I 
> > didn't reject the original mail?" (with the same message)?
> > �
> > The original mail is a "Microsoft" looking message 
> purporting to warn
> > �
> >
> > MicroSoft News
> > Warning:
> > a new virus, [EMAIL PROTECTED], can infect your computer.
> > etc...
> > �
> > Cary Fitch
> > �
> > �
> > �
> > ���
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 5:07 PM
> > Subject:You sent potentially unsafe content: Spam and VIRUS
> >
> >
> > IMPORTANT NOTICE
> >
> > You sent an e-mail containing potentially harmful content
> >
> > You are receiving this notice because you sent a message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] contains potentially harmful 
> content such 
> > as viruses or forbidden attachments. Your message has been 
> cleaned of 
> > its suspicious content and is enclosed as an attachment. If 
> you have 
> > any doubts about the message or about the validity of this notice, 
> > please contact your System Administrator.
> >
> > Suspicious content:
> >
> > Virus 'Exploit-URLSpoof.gen' in 'unnamed'
> >
> > Virus 'Exploit-URLSpoof.gen' in 'unnamed'
> >
> > Powered byVircom inc.
> > Questions? Contact your System Administrator
> > About Modus
> 
> 
> **
> To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
> 


**
To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.

Reply via email to