On 04-10-2008, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
> BTW, if I am right, you would see the behaviour you expect to see if you use:
>
> WSGIApplicationGroup %{GLOBAL}
More or less, it give me alternatively two differents local instances...
But i'm agree with your analyze, that to use threading.local is not
reliable. It's ok to keep the connection for the time of the request but
not for a persistent pool between requests. It's just to know about it.
The only problem is that there is not a lot of db pool utilities and
dbutils is one of the most famous...
--
William Dodé - http://flibuste.net
Informaticien Indépendant
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"modwsgi" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
