2008/10/25 MilesTogoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> okay I'm writing up the page for use with werkzeug and puting it up on a
> new VPS slice.   I'm using one of the other framework pages as a page
> template.  Some questions:
>
> 1) on the quick installation page - there is no Ubuntu paragraph -
> should there be or is it just assumed to be the same as Debian.  If not,
> do you want me to write up something on using with Ubuntu ?

See discussion:

  http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi/browse_frm/thread/2f3a30655bd47755

Ideally would have separate pages for each Linux variant giving how to
install binary RPMs, where Apache configurations is, how to enable
modules and how to control Apache. I don't know what is required for
each and also haven't had time to lay down a framework into which
people can put what is required for each. What was included in the
quick installation guide was minimal information I had from prior mail
discussions. Could even be wrong for all I know.

> 2) re Apache - the quick install page says we can use either Apache.  If
> we are not doing anything special with threads, is there any advantage
> of selecting either prefork or mfm ... ?  ie would one be more simpler,
> faster, reliable.....

Performance isn't much different. Worker MPM generally uses less
memory overall as less Apache child processes on system to handle same
number of requests. Worker MPM is however incompatible with PHP as it
is apparently still not thread safe.

If not using PHP and using mod_wsgi embedded mode and want to try and
reduce memory usage, use worker MPM.

If not using PHP and using mod_wsgi daemon mode to run application,
worker MPM would still be preferred even though Apache child processes
not running application.

If running a performance demanding web site and have lots and lots of
memory available, use prefork and run in embedded mode.

> 3) as I get this page flushed out should I simply upload the html file
> to the google code link you provided ?  any special privileges needed ?

It actually wouldn't take me long to do a Werkzeug page. I haven't due
to time limitations, but also because it is one of the easier ones to
setup and configure, so didn't need as much hand holding as others.

If you do something, just as easy to send in an email to this list as
straight tex (or Trac like wiki markup). Then I can comment on it
first if necessary before putting it into a page.

Graham

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"modwsgi" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to