> >> Overall I am not sure the transient amount of memory saved from > >> reclaiming idle threads is really worth it. > > > Yeah, I didn't mean to suggest it as a feature. > > Wasn't taking it that way. My final comment was just my own general > observation and not a reason as to why I wouldn't implement it. There > are other reasons I wouldn't do it, the main being complexity that > supporting a dynamically resizing thread pool and the need to ensure > one properly cleans up cached thread state objects and thread local > data.
Doesn't Apache already have something like that that you could reuse? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "modwsgi" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
