On 24-07-2009, gert wrote: > > On Jul 24, 9:54 am, William Dode <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 24-07-2009, Graham Dumpleton wrote: >> >> > This project isn't exactly one where many >> > people are working on it, so it is not like it brings any needed >> > features. >> >> I think there are a lot of people working on/with it that you don't see. >> mod_wsgi is a critical piece of software, it serve websites ! Just me, >> very little freelance, i serve 25 professional apps. For this i don't >> use the releases, but an hg branch from the svn that i follow carrefuly. >> One time for example i found a bug and you send me a patch that you >> didn't put immediatly on the svn. So after that, i had to take care that >> this patch was not erased by the svn... With an hg *private* branch >> i could more easily keep my patchs. And if somebody else wanted this >> patch that i tested, he could branch *my* branch. Then, when somes >> people had tested this patch on their private branch you could just pull >> one of them. >> >> Having said that, it's more important that you don't loose your time to >> switch if you're not ready for that. > > Aldo Graham told me he had allot of work, i can safley conclude he > defenatly going to switch sooner or later now that he knows both svn > and hg can coexist in google.
Are you sure they can coexist ? I believe we can switch from one to the other, but not use them together, i mean for the same branch. -- William Dodé - http://flibuste.net Informaticien Indépendant --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "modwsgi" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
