2010/3/9 Graham Dumpleton <[email protected]>:
> On 10 March 2010 00:41, Josh <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Mar 9, 1:11 am, Graham Dumpleton <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> Seems that because RHEL ships an old mod_python and/or one that is
>>> linked statically with Python and not dynamically, and as such can't
>>> be loaded at the same time as mod_wsgi reliably, that rather than fix
>>> their broken mod_python or ship a newer version that doesn't have the
>>> issue, that it was suggested that RHEL remove mod_wsgi as a package
>>> instead. Luckily others have suggested not taking such action.
>>>
>> I don't see anyone suggesting that mod_wsgi be removed from EPEL.  I
>> explicitly stated that I didn't think it should be pulled from EPEL at
>> all.  RHEL does not control what packages are deployed in EPEL, it is
>> a separate entity and as such it is up to the drivers of EPEL to
>> determine what packages are in EPEL, not RHEL.  For the record, RHEL5
>> ships with mod_python 3.2.8 dynamically linked.
>>
>> Currently mod_wsgi is not distributed with RHEL though there is a bug
>> request to have it included in the base distribution [1].  As such, I
>> am working to deploy updated version of mod_wsgi to Fedora so that it
>> has the greatest chance of being included in RHEL6.
>>
>>> http://www.linux-archive.org/epel-development/338102-mod_wsgi.html
>>>
>>> Shakes head. :-(
>>>
>>> Graham
>>
>> -josh
>>
>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510323
>
> Sorry, didn't word it very well. Rather than it being suggested by a
> person, more that if the rules were applied rigorously that it should
> be removed.
>
> Overall I still find the RedHat situation a bit frustrating/maddening
> at times. They persist with an ancient version of mod_python which is
> known to have quite substantial/serious bugs in it and rather than
> correctly identify that the real problem is mod_python, mod_wsgi is
> instead seen as being in conflict when it is mod_wsgi which is
> actually correctly implemented and that mod_python version which is
> flawed. RedHat keeping that buggy mod_python versions is really not
> doing anyone any favours. If it isn't going to be updated you should
> just drop mod_python completely from the distribution.

Yes. The best would be to swap mod_python and mod_wsgi places in both
RHEL 6 and Fedora 13. Move mod_python from RHEL 6 to EPEL and mod_wsgi
from EPEL to RHEL 6. Analogously include mod_wgsi in Fedora 13 and
take mod_python out of it. Both are already in Everything.

Regards, Clodoaldo

>
> All I can say is that I really hope that RedHat incorporated into that
> ancient version of mod_python the security fix described in:
>
>  http://www.modpython.org/3.1.4.html
>
> If it hasn't then you are opening up users of that mod_python package
> to exploits which could steal sensitive information from their
> applications.
>
> Graham
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "modwsgi" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"modwsgi" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en.

Reply via email to