Followup to this thread is okay. On 17 June 2010 18:48, Aljosa Mohorovic <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 16, 12:05 pm, Graham Dumpleton <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Have a read of the thread: >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi/browse_frm/thread/d0b1d5eb77f5... >> >> There are various suggestions in there of how to do the sort of thing >> you want, including trying to provide a way to allow instances for a >> specific revision to be delegated to their own daemon process group to >> keep them distinct from others. >> >> Especially see the VirtualDocumentRoot examples. Indicate whether you >> have any restrictions on being able to use VirtualDocumentRoot and >> then we can go from there or refine that method. > > i need couple of days to read the docs and test this, should i post > here when i figure out how this works of should i start a new thread? > > Aljosa > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "modwsgi" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "modwsgi" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en.
