On 3 September 2011 04:41, djmurf <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for the input. > I have already looked at mod_auth_tkt, and unfortunately the one > disadvantage that they advertise is no basic auth support, and that is one > of the auth schemes that I do have to support.
It says: Drop-in replacement for Basic Authentication: mod_auth_tkt sets the Basic Authentication REMOTE_USER environment variable on authorised requests, so that existing scripts that work with Basic Authentication should work unchanged in a mod_auth_tkt environment. which to me says they do support it, they might just implement it themselves rather than hooking in to Apache 2.2 auth providers. Should still do what is required though. Did you try it? Where did you see that it does not support it? Graham > Plus I have to tie this into an existing SSO system that generates it's own > tokens, and I understand that mod_auth_tkt generates it's own tokens > internally. > I do appreciate the suggestion! > Dean > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "modwsgi" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/modwsgi/-/OaMQf6ZtwJgJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "modwsgi" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en.
