Thanks all for the replies. Yes, I fixed the issue "by hand" on my system, I just wanted to draw attention to the issue so that a fix can make it into the project.
On Sunday, 13 April 2014 04:12:28 UTC+3, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > Since you are compiling from source code, all you need to do is change > MPM_ITK to ITK_MPM in mod_wsgi.c file before running make. There is no > other change to be made for this issue. > > I am not sure when the next release of mod_wsgi will be. I am going to be > trying hard to get a new release out, but I am not sure what may get in the > way. > > Graham > > On 12/04/2014, at 9:09 PM, Chris Shelton > <[email protected]<javascript:>> > wrote: > > I believe that I also ran into this exact issue on my gentoo system as > well. I recently switched from prefork to the ITK MPM, and recompiled > mod_wsgi and apache earlier today to attempt to switch my trac installation > (using mod_wsgi) to a different virtual host host running as a different > user id from the overall server default. > > After restarting apache, the socket file is still owned by the main apache > user. I added a hack to chown the socket to the end of the start section > of the init.d script, but it would be preferable for this to work without > that customization. > > Is there a bug ID or ETA for when the fix to mod_wsgi will be available? > Thanks for your work on this module. > > chris > > On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 6:50:34 AM UTC-4, Graham Dumpleton wrote: >> >> >> On 08/04/2014, at 5:04 AM, George Barbăroşie <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> > >> > I'm confused at the use of #if defined(MPM_ITK) in mod_wsgi.c in >> wsgi_setup_socket. On gentoo the apache headers compiled with mpm_itk >> define ITK_MPM but not MPM_ITK and I cannot find anything in the mpm_itk >> sources defining MPM_ITK. Version 2.2.17-01 of mpm_itk (the one for apache >> 2.2 series) defines ITK_MPM as well as MPM_NAME "ITK", but it does not set >> MPM_ITK at all. This seems to also be in line with other MPM's, i.e. >> prefork defines PREFORK_MPM not MPM_PREFORK, worker defines WORKER_MPM, >> etc. >> > >> > Could this be a typo in mod_wsgi or am I not looking in the right place >> in the mpm_itk header files? >> >> Possibly. I went back to the original email about it from 2010 and it >> clearly had the correct way in it. >> >> What I don't understand is that people have used it successfully since >> then and no one else had said anything. >> >> Maybe it defined both at some point and removed the one which didn't >> match convention for other modules at some point. >> >> I could point at mod_fcgid and say they did it the same way, but actually >> looks like they copied what mod_wsgi was doing. :-) >> >> I will change it to check for both just in case. >> >> Graham >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "modwsgi" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <javascript:> > . > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "modwsgi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
