The %{RESOURCE} has no meaning for WSGIImportScript.

You would need to work out exactly what the calculated default for %{RESOURCE} 
is for the target application by looking at mod_wsgi.application_group and list 
that explicitly for application-group in the WSGIImportScript.

If each WSGI application is in its own daemon process group, you should be 
forcing it to use %{GLOBAL} for application group anyway, as that equates to 
the main Python interpreter. Use of the main interpreter avoids some issues 
that can come up with C extension modules for Python that haven't been coded 
properly to work in a sub interpreter.

Graham

On 12/07/2014, at 4:40 PM, theliuy <[email protected]> wrote:

> Oh! Thanks. They were using different application groups. I found the default 
> value of WSGIApplicationGroup is %{RESOURCE}, while I tried 
> 
> WSGIImportScript /some/path/patch.py process-group=some_process_gronp 
> application-group=%{RESOURCE}
> 
> Looks like the application-group of patch.py was assigned to '%{RESOURCE}'. 
> And I have to declare WSGIApplicationGroup explicitly. Do we have any other 
> way to make it?
> 
> Thanks,
> Yang
> 
> On Saturday, July 12, 2014 3:51:13 PM UTC-7, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> Add debug printing out:
> 
> import mod_wsgi
> print mod_wsgi.process_group
> print mod_wsgi.application_group
> 
> This will verify the Python sub interpreter that the patch.py is being loaded 
> in. It should be the same as your WSGI application.
> 
> Graham
> 
> On 12/07/2014, at 3:37 PM, theliuy <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Graham,
>> 
>> My scripts were loaded successfully when mod_wsgi creates processes. I am 
>> using Daemon mode, and WSGIImportScript is declared inside of VirtualHost. 
>> Thank you a lot. 
>> 
>> I got another problem, which may be a little bit off topic in this group. I 
>> used wrapt.when_imported to register a function when importing flask.app, 
>> while it doesn't work. In my application I printed out sys.modules, and 
>> found that wrapt and related modules were not there. I also checked 
>> sys.meta_path. At the end of the pre-loaded scripts (let's call it 
>> patch.py), sys.meta_path had one ImportHookFinder instance, while in my app, 
>> sys.meta_path was empty. Looks like after loading patch.py, modules were 
>> unloaded and finder objects were cleared. I also found patch.py and the 
>> application were running in the same process and both were in the main 
>> thread, as what I expected.
>> 
>> Do you know any solution to it? Looking forward to your reply.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Yang
>> 
>> 
>> On Friday, July 4, 2014 3:14:04 PM UTC-7, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>> Does it strictly need a WSGI middleware?
>> 
>> What I have done isn't strictly a WSGI middleware as it just passes things 
>> through and doesn't need to wrap access to wsgi.input nor do anything with 
>> the response.
>> 
>> It could easily be modified to do that though if needed.
>> 
>> You can find an example of a quite deeming logging middleware at:
>> 
>>     
>> http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/DebuggingTechniques#Tracking_Request_and_Response
>> 
>> Instead of just having:
>> 
>>     return wrapped(*args, **kwargs)
>> 
>> you would have something like:
>> 
>>     return LoggingMiddleware(wrapped, '/tmp/wsgi')(*args, **kwargs)
>> 
>> Graham
>> 
>> On 05/07/2014, at 8:07 AM, theliuy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Graham,
>>> 
>>> I tried to implement it as you described. It really helps. Thanks a lot.
>>> 
>>> What I am trying to do is, I want to listen and log every requests coming 
>>> to my applications. I have already made some scripts to analyze the log and 
>>> find some interesting requests from specific user, and also built a tool to 
>>> mock what he/she did. It is used to reproduce some bugs caused by 
>>> consequent calls. I am looking for a way to implement this procedure into 
>>> other projects. Since log analyzer and mock tool are offline and flexible, 
>>> one of the difficulties is how to log coming requests. Registering it to 
>>> every flask app or wsgis needs lots of work, that's why I am looking for a 
>>> way to implement a "middleware" between apache/wsgi_mod and flask app.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Yang
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Friday, July 4, 2014 5:14:49 AM UTC-7, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>>> Okay, seems you can now use WSGIImportScript inside of VirtualHost.
>>> 
>>> A long long time ago this wasn't the case. Seems I fixed it at some point 
>>> so that it is now possible but the docs weren't updated. I did look at the 
>>> code to try and work it out when I responded but was looking in the wrong 
>>> place for what dictates whether the directive can be used in a VirtualHost.
>>> 
>>> So you don't need to worry about using WSGIScriptAlias at all. You can 
>>> always use WSGIImportScript, placing it after the WSGIDaemonProcess 
>>> directive for the daemon process group that the WSGIImportScript needs to 
>>> refer to, even inside of the VirtualHost.
>>> 
>>> Graham 
>>> 
>>> On 04/07/2014, at 9:25 PM, Graham Dumpleton <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 04/07/2014, at 7:58 PM, Graham Dumpleton <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> On 04/07/2014, at 5:52 PM, theliuy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> I have several web services using Apache + mod_wsgi + Flask. For some 
>>>>>> debug purpose, I want to listen the incoming requests and log them. I 
>>>>>> don't want to modify flask applications, or wsgi scripts neither. 
>>>>>> Because there are too many existing projects, I can't do it one by one. 
>>>>>> And they are going to be deployed in multiple environment, I just need 
>>>>>> this feature in one or two of them.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> One possible solution come to my mind is to modify Flask framework. 
>>>>>> Implement a "logger" inside flask. I think it will be better if I can 
>>>>>> find a way to register a script in mod_wsgi. Let mod_wsgi run it 
>>>>>> whenever requests are coming.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I don't know if there is any better way to make it. Please give me some 
>>>>>> hint. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> What about the request are you wanting to log exactly and for what 
>>>>> purpose?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I can explain a way of doing what you want which avoids you needing to 
>>>>> change either the code of your application, Flask or any other package, 
>>>>> but the context of what you are trying to capture and why will help as I 
>>>>> will then know what sort of WSGI middleware I will need to employ to 
>>>>> capture what you need.
>>>>> 
>>>>> So if you can respond with that extra information and in the mean time I 
>>>>> will validate that my idea for how to do it will work.
>>>> 
>>>> I would still like to know what you are trying to capture, but if you 
>>>> really want to avoid making changes to any existing code or third party 
>>>> modules, you can do the following. The technique uses monkey patching, 
>>>> employing the `wrapt` library to simplify the process and ensure how the 
>>>> monkey patching is done is correct.
>>>> 
>>>> First up, you need to have the `wrapt` module installed.
>>>> 
>>>> pip install wrapt
>>>> 
>>>> Next, create a file called 'patch.py' which contains:
>>>> 
>>>> from __future__ import print_function
>>>> 
>>>> from wrapt import when_imported, wrap_function_wrapper
>>>> 
>>>> def flask_wsgi_app_wrapper(wrapped, instance, args, kwargs):
>>>>     def bind_call_args(environ, *args, **kwargs):
>>>>         return environ
>>>> 
>>>>     environ = bind_call_args(*args, **kwargs)
>>>> 
>>>>     print(10*'>')
>>>>     for key in sorted(environ.keys()):
>>>>         print('%s: %s' % (key, repr(environ[key])))
>>>>     print(10*'<')
>>>> 
>>>>     return wrapped(*args, **kwargs)
>>>> 
>>>> @when_imported('flask.app')
>>>> def instrument_flask_app(module):
>>>>     wrap_function_wrapper(module, 'Flask.wsgi_app', flask_wsgi_app_wrapper)
>>>> 
>>>> What needs to be done now is that this 'patch.py' file has to be imported 
>>>> somehow and it ideally needs to be imported before the actual WSGI 
>>>> application script file is imported. It preferably would just have been 
>>>> imported at the start of the specific WSGI script file for the application 
>>>> you want to add debugging to. But since you don't want to do that, then 
>>>> you will need to modify the Apache configuration file and use mod_wsgi to 
>>>> preload it.
>>>> 
>>>> What exactly you need to do here may depend on whether you are using 
>>>> mod_wsgi embedded mode or daemon mode. If using daemon mode, it may also 
>>>> depend on whether the WSGIDaemonProcess directives are specified inside of 
>>>> the context of a VirtualHost, or outside at global server scope.
>>>> 
>>>> The problem here is that the WSGIImportScript can only be defined at 
>>>> global server scope. That is, it cannot be specified inside of a 
>>>> VirtualHost, but has to be outside.
>>>> 
>>>> Right now I can't remember the rules about whether a WSGIImportScript can 
>>>> refer to a daemon process group specified using WSGIDaemonProcess 
>>>> directive inside of a VirtualHost.
>>>> 
>>>> If it can, then the WSGIImportScript directive will at least have to be 
>>>> added after the VirtualHost containing the WSGIDaemonProcess.
>>>> 
>>>> Anyway, if you are using embedded mode at least, then you need to use the 
>>>> WSGIImportScript directive as:
>>>> 
>>>> WSGIImportScript /some/path/patch.py process-group=%{GLOBAL} 
>>>> application-group=%{GLOBAL}
>>>> 
>>>> The application-group option should be set to the specific application 
>>>> group context that the WSGI application you want to debug, is running in.
>>>> 
>>>> What will happen is that when the Apache child worker processes are 
>>>> started up and Python gets initialised, mod_wsgi will preload the patch.py 
>>>> file into the Python interpreter.
>>>> 
>>>> In being imported, the @with_imported decorator will register that the 
>>>> instrument_flask_app() function should be called when the 'flask.app' 
>>>> module is imported by the WSGI application.
>>>> 
>>>> When the module is the flask.app module is import, the 
>>>> instrument_flask_app() function is executed at that point, it will be 
>>>> passed the flask.app module before the import even returns the module to 
>>>> the code that imported it. The Flask.wsgi_app() method will then have a 
>>>> function wrapper applied using wrap_function_wrapper().
>>>> 
>>>> Later when handling a WSGI request, the Flask.wsgi_app() will be called. 
>>>> At that point the flask_wsgi_app_wrapper() wrapper will actually be 
>>>> called. Inside of that we bind the function arguments to extract the 
>>>> 'environ' argument passed to the WSGI application entry point for Flask. 
>>>> The wrapper function can then print out what it wants from 'environ'. 
>>>> Finally, the wrapper will call the original wrapped Flask.wsgi_app() 
>>>> method so the WSGI application can handle the request.
>>>> 
>>>> So that is the principle of how it works, but that Apache configuration 
>>>> only works with embedded mode for sure. If using daemon mode we may not be 
>>>> able to use WSGIImportScript however and may have to use another trick.
>>>> 
>>>> For daemon mode therefore, if the WSGIDaemonProcess directive is actually 
>>>> specified outside of any VirtualHost, then we can still use 
>>>> WSGIImportScript. Thus you would use:
>>>> 
>>>> WSGIImportScript /some/path/patch.py process-group=group 
>>>> application-group=%{GLOBAL}
>>>> 
>>>> The process-group option would be set to the daemon process group name, 
>>>> and application-group option again set to the specific application group 
>>>> context that the WSGI application you want to debug, is running in.
>>>> 
>>>> The WSGIImportScript in this case should come after the WSGIDaemonProcess 
>>>> directive it is referring to.
>>>> 
>>>> Now if the WSGIDaemonProcess group directive is inside of the VirtualHost, 
>>>> I am not sure if one can do:
>>>> 
>>>> <VirtualHost *:80>
>>>> ...
>>>> WSGIDaemonProcess group
>>>> ...
>>>> </VirtualHost>
>>>> 
>>>> WSGIImportScript /some/path/patch.py process-group=group 
>>>> application-group=%{GLOBAL}
>>>> 
>>>> If that doesn't work, we have to cheat a bit and do:
>>>> 
>>>> <VirtualHost *:80>
>>>> ...
>>>> WSGIDaemonProcess group
>>>> WSGIScriptAlias /.patch /some/path/patch.py process-group=group 
>>>> application-group=%{GLOBAL}
>>>> <Location /.patch>
>>>> Deny from all
>>>> </Location>
>>>> ...
>>>> </VirtualHost>
>>>> 
>>>> In other words, we actually use WSGIScriptAlias and the fact that if both 
>>>> process-group and application-group are specified, that the WSGI script 
>>>> file would normally be preloaded.
>>>> 
>>>> Since we have to specify a URL as the mount point and there will be no 
>>>> actual WSGI application in the script file, then we use a Location block 
>>>> to block access to the URL to force a forbidden HTTP response if someone 
>>>> tries to access that URL.
>>>> 
>>>> That therefore represents a technical solution for what I believe you 
>>>> want. The question now is if you really need to do what you think you do.
>>>> 
>>>> Note that if you are really after a monitoring solution for evaluating 
>>>> application performance, then there are better ways of doing what you want.
>>>> 
>>>> If you do try it and have the case of using WSGIDaemonProcess inside of a 
>>>> VirtualHost, do tell me if WSGIImportScript outside of the VirtualHost can 
>>>> still refer to it. I will try and test it myself, but it isn't convenient 
>>>> to do so right now.
>>>> 
>>>> Graham
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "modwsgi" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "modwsgi" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "modwsgi" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"modwsgi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to