Greetings Jay We've thought about it, but the fact that the cluster has to run all in memory prices this a bit out of our range.
We're planning to revisit this when disk based clustering is available in mysql. Clint Twelve Horses Mobile Social Web Email Clinton Goudie-Nice Architect / Senior Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +1.801.571.2665 ext 3264 Mobile: +1.801.915.0629 Fax: +1.801.571.2669 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cgoudie Twelve Horses 13961 Minuteman Drive Suite 125 Draper, UT 84020 www.twelvehorses.com On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 16:05 -0700, J. Shirley wrote: > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Clinton Goudie-Nice > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Our database looks the same; however since you can only have one master > > tracker running at any time, no one will be running updates against your > > other master DB. > > > > Clint > > > > > > > > > > Just out of curiosity, have any production installations attempted to > run on a MySQL Cluster (NDB Cluster)? It seems like a slightly safer > method for scaling upwards without having to deal with a 3rd party HA > VIP setup. > > -Jay >
