We've been using lighttpd, and it works OK. We have run into problems using the default mogile-generated config not being able to fully utilize the devices. I *think* we have that solved now though. We also saw possible stat caching issues around new dir creation.
server.stat-cache-engine = "disable" server.network-backend = "linux-sendfile" server.event-handler = "linux-sysepoll" server.max-worker = 8 lighttpd-1.4.15 --Justin Greg Connor wrote: > Andy Lo A Foe wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In my experience WebDAV storage setup (lighttpd, nginx) are much >> better at handling large chunks/files than mogstored. I use nginx in a >> production environment with files ranging from a couple of bytes to a >> gigabyte, no problem. In the pre-production tests I ran mogstored died >> reliably with OOM's when handling 100MB+ files. Use mogstored only to >> manage the usage stats on your storage nodes in that case. > > > Hi Andy, thanks for the reply. > > Do you feel nginx is better than lighttpd for this? How about apache? > > Is it simply a matter of having the other httpd listen on another port, > and entering that port number in a config file? Did you have to do > anything special to configure httpd (for example, to automatically > create directories that don't yet exist for PUT requests?) > > thanks again >
