On 10/17/07, Gary Oberbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's wrong with recaptcha (http://recaptcha.net/)? It's a decent captcha > system, and it helps scan old books (a CMU project). It has audio for the
recaptcha is pretty cool, as captcha goes. I wonder if making the captcha part of the registration process, instead of the editing process, would be sufficient. That would have a substantially lower human overhead, but would also be easier to deal with for bots (farming out the captcha recognition to humans, which I've heard is already being done). -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> "Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Moin-user mailing list Moin-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/moin-user
