On 6/23/11 2:09 PM, Raul Cuza wrote:
> Hola Chris,
>
> If you use `touch filename` instead of `vi filename` do you get the same
> results? You can use `stat filename` to see what changes before and after
> using the vi. I suspect `touch` will make the same change.
Thanks for the reply. I already figured out that 'touch' does the same thing
as 'vi'...it allows the file to be read. Another reader e-mailed me with a few
suggestions.
I originally tried "find . -exec touch {} \;", which changed the timestamp on
the files, but did NOT fix the problem. Just a minute or two ago, I tried
"find . -name 00* -exec touch {} \;", and a quick check of a few pages would
seem to indicate that it might have done the trick. The magic of Unix, I
guess. :)
Chris
_____________________________________________
Chris Freemesser, University of Rochester
Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences /
Center for Visual Science
Meliora Hall, Room 244
E-Mail: ch...@cvs.rochester.edu
Phone: (585)275-0786
_____________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger.
Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe,
secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic?
Nope - It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Moin-user mailing list
Moin-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/moin-user
