On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:26:51PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:54:50PM +0200, Thomas Waldmann wrote: >>> >i had a quick look at the subscribed users caching patch and I suspect >>> >that might not be the case there. >>> >>> Hmmm. It seems to work fine for me in testing, but it's possible that >>> testing hasn't exercised all paths yet. Any suggestions on where to >>> check? >> >>Check for race conditions / multi-threading/processing issues. What >>happens if 2 cache updates happen at about the same time? > >Hmmm, OK. I naively assumed that the cache layer might handle locking >itself, that's a shame.
Apologies, misunderstood you last night when I wrote that. I have an updated patch that I've just attached: http://moinmo.in/MoinMoinBugs/GetSubscribersSlow?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=subscribercache.patch which seems to work for me. What do you think? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com < sladen> I actually stayed in a hotel and arrived to find a post-it note stuck to the mini-bar saying "Paul: This fridge and fittings are the correct way around and do not need altering" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Moin-user mailing list Moin-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/moin-user
