Hello

Le 14/02/2020 à 16:39, Anders Hammar a écrit :
Sounds good to me! We need more activity!

/Anders

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 2:54 PM Baptiste Mathus <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Thanks for raising this question Anders!

    AFAIK, we don't have a strict process. Or at least I'd say this
    process has not been exercised enough in the last years to be
    considered really *our* process I guess...

    So, I've been pondering a bit on this.

    Given our current status (I.e. not extremely active and many de
    facto abandoned plugins)
    I'm thinking that maybe we'd want to transform our process to be
    more like the Jenkins one: moving away from an all-or-nothing
    maintainer access, and giving maintainer permissions in a more
    open manner/less barrier (which was anyway part of the reasoning
    behind MOJO vs. Apache).

    Also, our current status from an ownership perspective seems quite
    dangerous: we have 31 owners (23 having 2FA enabled).

    I would propose /something/ like the following:

    * We reduce the number of people with owner status (e.g. by
    removing the ones without 2FA enabled, then pinging existing
    people to see if they're willing to keep the permissions)

    * We initiate maintainers' team per plugin.
    ** By default, we could for instance only put 'members' (as listed
    in GitHub) who merged anything since we switched to GitHub.

I am interested by your proposal for the javacc-maven-plugin. I started to work on this plugin under the umbrella of Jochen Wiedmann <[email protected]>. But despite many mails on the subject, he stopped the exchange about my PR, may be because what I was proposing was too dumb...(no one knows ALL of the Maven ecosystem, specially the newcomers). I am a owner-by-side of the JavaCC library and as I got no response from Jochen Wiedmann <[email protected]> and this plugin needs a update for the upcoming release of JavaCC, I started to forks this javacc-maven-plugin by changing its groupId to org.javacc. _I do not want to go in this direction of making a fork_, but I need to extend the Mojo javacc-maven-plugin for building JavaCC itself.



    Anyway, not really asking for specifics at this stage. More like:
    do you agree with the general idea/intent?

    Overall what I'm saying is I think we should together make the
    barrier lower so mojohaus keeps rocking, instead of keeping it
    locked and it progressively decays even more in terms of activity...

    WDYT ?

    -- Baptiste

    Le mar. 11 févr. 2020 à 08:56, Anders Hammar <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :

        Hi,

        At Codehaus Mojo I think we added new devs/committers to the
        team when accepting them, so they can work on all plugins. But
        know it looks like some devs have been added separately to
        just one plugin.
        As there is a new dev whosing interest in working with ther
        aspectj-m-p I wonder how we should handle that?

        /Anders
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "mojohaus-dev" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
        it, send an email to [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>.
        To view this discussion on the web visit
        
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mojohaus-dev/CAKDUN1u7nVywOa9D%2BfD6fSEDA29RfKaDFgJaCBdduh_2W7MQ-A%40mail.gmail.com
        
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mojohaus-dev/CAKDUN1u7nVywOa9D%2BfD6fSEDA29RfKaDFgJaCBdduh_2W7MQ-A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "mojohaus-dev" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To view this discussion on the web visit
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mojohaus-dev/CANWgJS6ZTM3f2rEv8sVLW8UeuU6a0vJvTzfKPx3E-jHNXwG3Rw%40mail.gmail.com
    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mojohaus-dev/CANWgJS6ZTM3f2rEv8sVLW8UeuU6a0vJvTzfKPx3E-jHNXwG3Rw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mojohaus-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mojohaus-dev/CAKDUN1vUbA_YLcfyrr9aUDtNL0qyJSf1%3D7a_sR5NjMeOQA7JKg%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mojohaus-dev/CAKDUN1vUbA_YLcfyrr9aUDtNL0qyJSf1%3D7a_sR5NjMeOQA7JKg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mojohaus-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mojohaus-dev/0f1da4b5-f0b3-6f99-b084-21f5b9348c12%40orange.fr.

Reply via email to