Wow, the "how to release" page is extremely outdated.

DSA keys… they are deprecated for years now and we are moving from RSA to 
ECC now.

About the run time… I did a dry run of release:prepare and found:
[INFO] [prepare dry-run] 17/17 end-release 
[INFO] Release preparation simulation complete. 
[INFO] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS 
[INFO] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
[INFO] Total time:  32.543 s 
[INFO] Finished at: 2021-05-27T22:39:41+02:00 
[INFO] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

I will ping some other committers and ask about what to do in your case.

joerg.h...@googlemail.com schrieb am Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2021 um 21:50:04 
UTC+2:

> Hi Bean,
>
> thanks for your response and your suggestion.
> I updated parent to the latest release 61:
>
> https://github.com/mojohaus/servicedocgen-maven-plugin/commit/ca831c4821200ea162174533cf7293d433b03c53
>
> After rerunning the release process I ended up with the exact same 
> behaviour.
>
> BTW:
>     [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
>     [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     [INFO] Total time:  01:25 h
>     [INFO] Finished at: 2021-05-27T21:38:28+02:00
>
> IMHO almost 1,5h is extraordinary slow for the release of a simple mojo.
> Something wrong with OSSRH nexus?
>
> It seems that release plugins hates me as I hat it.
> Is mojohaus still following the manifesto or have we changed to a 
> collaboration of agile sub-projects where only the results count?
> So if nobody forces me to follow the official process and to use 
> release-maven-plugin, I can do the release with "devon release" from 
> devonfw-ide or I can also try to automate it via github actions.
>
> Kind regards
>   Jörg
> Ben M. schrieb am Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2021 um 19:22:54 UTC+2:
>
>> Have you tried updating the parent pom?
>> I think you will need more recent versions of some plugins, especially 
>> the deploy and gpg plugins.
>>
>> joerg.h...@googlemail.com schrieb am Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2021 um 
>> 16:48:39 UTC+2:
>>
>>> Dear mojohaus experts,
>>>
>>> after a long while I want to build a release of one of my mojos.
>>> I tried to exactly follow the instructions:
>>> https://www.mojohaus.org/development/performing-a-release.html
>>>
>>> Whilst running mvn release:perform I saw log message like this:
>>>     Uploading to ossrh-staging: 
>>> http://oss.sonatype.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2/org/codehaus/mojo/servicedocgen-maven-plugin/1.0.0-beta-4/servicedocgen-maven-plugin-1.0.0-beta-4.jar
>>>     [WARNING] Failed to upload checksum 
>>> org/codehaus/mojo/servicedocgen-maven-plugin/1.0.0-beta-4/servicedocgen-maven-plugin-1.0.0-beta-4.jar.sha1:
>>>  
>>> null
>>>     [WARNING] Failed to upload checksum 
>>> org/codehaus/mojo/servicedocgen-maven-plugin/1.0.0-beta-4/servicedocgen-maven-plugin-1.0.0-beta-4.jar.md5:
>>>  
>>> null
>>>
>>> However, build gave me SUCCESS so I closed the repo in OSSRH.
>>> That now failed with this error:
>>> Requires one-of SHA-1: 
>>> /org/codehaus/mojo/servicedocgen-maven-plugin/1.0.0-beta-4/servicedocgen-maven-plugin-1.0.0-beta-4.jar.sha1,
>>>  
>>> MD5: 
>>> /org/codehaus/mojo/servicedocgen-maven-plugin/1.0.0-beta-4/servicedocgen-maven-plugin-1.0.0-beta-4.jar.md5,
>>>  
>>> SHA-256: 
>>> /org/codehaus/mojo/servicedocgen-maven-plugin/1.0.0-beta-4/servicedocgen-maven-plugin-1.0.0-beta-4.jar.sha256,
>>>  
>>> SHA-512: 
>>> /org/codehaus/mojo/servicedocgen-maven-plugin/1.0.0-beta-4/servicedocgen-maven-plugin-1.0.0-beta-4.jar.sha512
>>>
>>> Can someone give me a hint what I might be doing wrong?
>>>
>>> Thanks & cheers
>>>   Jörg
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mojohaus-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mojohaus-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mojohaus-dev/e14a7602-2eed-4142-bbb4-7b050192ada1n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to