So, you're saying that I should run a separate instance of mojolicious for each apache virtualhost? That seems to me like it defeats the point of having a mojolicious http server in the first place.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Charlie Brady < [email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Cosimo Streppone wrote: > > > On 02/19/2014 05:20 PM, John Dunlap wrote: > > > > > 2) I work for a SAAS provider and we use Apache virtualhosts to sell > our > > > software to our customers. As Mojolicious uses its own built in HTTP > > > server, how do I achieve virtualhost-like behavior? > > > > You can run a Mojolicious app with Plack::Handler::Apache2 > > under Apache + mod_perl. > > Probably easier to run the apps standalone and access via apache using > mod_proxy. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Mojolicious" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mojolicious" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
