Re: [Mojolicious] Re: Why the Content-Type for *.jpg and *.JPG is different?

[Stefan Adams]

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:24 AM, sri <kra...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> What should be done about conflicting types?  e.g. dwg is
>> application/x-acad, image/x-dwg, and image/vnd.dwg
>>
>
> Just like "xml".
>
>     https://github.com/kraih/mojo/blob/master/lib/Mojolicious/Types.pm#L30
>

Thanks, sri! I'll do that!  Because alternatives are only used for
detection, do all valid options need to be ordered in anyway?  That is, is
it necessary that application/xml be listed before text/xml?

I trust then that everything else is OK with the plugin?

Oh, I didn't consider... What happens when you register a type that's
already registered? That is, core registers xml and certainly the plugin
does too. Is it important to skip already registered types, or, because
it's running only on MIME::Types, it's just going to redefine it to the
same thing so it doesn't matter that it redefines what what defined in core?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Mojolicious" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mojolicious+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mojolicious@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.