On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, sri wrote: > > I'm not sure of the apache version. I don't remember totally, but I > > wouldn't be surprised if it was a manual tweak to our suexec to increase > > security within our organization. > > You bring up a very good point though, this shit really makes my blood > boil, the RFC for CGI is basically worthless, because everybody cooks up > their own little subset/superset.
Everybody? A subset is just broken, and not your problem. A superset is irrelevant. > This might be the strongest argument yet for getting rid of > Mojo::Server::CGI and leaving all legacy deployment to > Mojo::Server::PSGI, which has been much less of a headache. I'd consider it to be quite a headache to need to set up a PSGI on all my systems which currently run multiple CGIs just fine. There's barely any change in CGI.pm between 3.33 and 5.04 - is it really such a maintenance burden? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mojolicious" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
