Not sure what kind of paid service this is, but I still think you should be allowed to be logged in. Example: You can be logged in from as many devices that you want, using Spotify, but you can only play music from one device at a time. Not sure if there's any service that can't fall into the same category: You could still restrict access to given resources, but why would you logout the other session, just if I suddenly wanted to change my email address in my profile page, from my phone..?
It's pretty annoying to log in. I would do that as rarely as possible. On Thursday, August 21, 2014 2:24:15 PM UTC+2, Stefan Adams wrote: > > > On Aug 21, 2014 7:15 AM, "Jan Henning Thorsen" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I think it's a very bad idea to only allow one login from one browser. > > What about a situation of a paid service and the license only grants the > user the ability to login from one machine, often the case because the > service provider doesn't want the paying user to share the account and > reduce the revenue owed to the service provider? > > I would agree with you, Jan, that I don't like these services either and > like the freedom and flexibility to login from multiple machines. But I can > understand the service providers' perspective to enforce non simultaneous > logins to meet the requirements of the business and not potentially lose > revenue. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mojolicious" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
