> > There would be no need to use 100 Continue, which is only useful for > clients that can't read and write at the same time. >
That statement is not entirely correct, 100 Continue is a bit of an idealistic approach, *if* it works correctly you can prevent a huge upload *and* reuse the connection afterwards if it was keep-alive. But this is very very hard to get right, and timeouts are involved that can and will cause things to fail randomly in fun ways. -- sebastian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mojolicious" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
