Step 2, which proves that jberger is wrong and his article
http://blogs.perl.org/users/joel_berger/2014/07/non-blocking-mojolicious-apps-are-even-easier-now.html
doesn't make any sense, and all who have read it are misleaded
mkdir /tmp/foo
cd /tmp/foo
cpanm -n -l local https://github.com/alexbyk/mojo/archive/v6.021.tar.gz
wget
"https://gist.githubusercontent.com/alexbyk/3dae9161f0ef54829957/raw/597de214548b60935c6b7bef979324668fb458f8/gistfile1.6pl";
-O check.pl
perl -I local/lib/perl5 check.pl
This code doesn't contain a leak at the end. You can run it as shown
above or with the current implementation - the behaviour will be the
same. This proves that IOC does nothing and he was using find_cycle the
wrong way. But after swithing to IOC nothing changed only the output
disappeared
Let's take one step at a time. Here is the first:
https://gist.github.com/alexbyk/c862da9e3451f021b418
as you can see there are no differences between DelaySimple and
DelayIOC... If even one person read this, run this code and confirm
"i'm starting to understand, I'm ready to see an explanation and admit
that i might be wrong " i'll write the next step with the detailed
explanation how IOClasses work and even point you at an example of
usage. Because if everybody keep saying "i'm a maintainer of mojo,
I'm smart enough and already know everything, be polite and follow our
rules" - there will be no reason to continue
That's the hardest thing, it's impossible to prove that something
doesn't contain somewhat. You couldn't prove that the God doesn't
exist, but if you find him - you can prove that. You can't prove
that linux kernel, mojolicious etc.. have no bugs, but if you
find a bug - you can prove that it contains it. You event can't
prove that you don't have 55 cents right now (maybe you're hiding
it in the pocket), but if you have 55 cent coin - you can prove
it just showing it.
You had my full attention, you could have written something
insightful, something all of us would benefit from. Like a detailed
explanation for how fieldhashes are just glorified globals, and
essentially the same as circular references, because they keep the
refcount of anything stored in them at +1. But instead you wrote
this. The next time you post a question, and wonder why nobody wants
to answer you, this is why.
--
sebastian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Mojolicious" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Mojolicious" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Mojolicious" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
