No. On Monday, April 6, 2015 at 5:13:08 PM UTC+2, Nathan Waddell wrote: > > Thanks, Glen. That's exactly what I'm using at the moment, but would a > patch to Mojolicious::Command::hypnotoad that provides the same > functionality be seen as having value? > > On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 4:43:05 PM UTC-5, tempire wrote: >> >> mojo version >> >> >> On Apr 3, 2015, at 3:42 PM, Nathan Waddell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I would like to be able to check the version of Hypnotoad at the command >> line with hypnotoad -v or hypnotoad --version. It would be additionally >> nice if the long form (--version) gave more in-depth output regarding the >> build, like the difference between perl -v and perl -V . >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Mojolicious" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> >>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mojolicious" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
