> > A few more runs, now with Mojolicious-6.51; most of them seem not quite > as erratic, but I have still seen the perl processes stop producing load > after a few (or very few) seconds with 10 workers or more. And sometimes > with fewer. >
Yea, we need to find out why that is. I'm still surprised that -M 2 didn't result in better load balancing. Perhaps a less conservative "-M 1 -a 0 -c 10" does better? -- sebastian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mojolicious" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
