>
> I'm guessing that wasn't the intent, but 
>
I'm not entirely sure after a brief glance at the implementation...
>

It is intended, of course we welcome ideas for making
Mojo::Promise more dwim, as long as it doesn't conflict with the
specs.

--
sebastian

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Mojolicious" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to