I'm not sure why you say it wouldn't be usable with Mojolicious. Mojolicious doesn't care what other modules you use. LWP won't be capable of non-blocking queries like Mojo::UserAgent will of course, but that's usually not important for the command line. If you want to do it with Mojo::UserAgent try https://metacpan.org/pod/Mojo::UserAgent::Role::Cache.
-Dan On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 8:44 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > First time poster. > > I have some command line apps that use LWP with LWP::UserAgent::Cached > for the local file-based cache to get() and later parse pages. I need to > use this local page cache so that I don't hit the web server repeatedly for > unchanged pages. I was hoping to use Mojolicious, but prefer not to try > to re-implement this caching. > > It doesn't appear that LWP::UserAgent::Cached would be usable with > Mojolicious, and don't see anything readily available as an alternative. > > Any advice? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Mojolicious" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mojolicious" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
