> David Nolan wrote:
> That doesn't do what I want. As far as I can tell remote.monitor loses
all
> the hostgroup/service information. On the server running remote.monitor
> everything from the remote server would show up in the same
> watchgroup/service.
> I want the master server to inherit the complete information about the
> status of every hostgroup and service, so it can do its own dependency
> checking, and make its own decisions regarding what to alert about.
with remote.monitor (v1.7)
you can use arg called (--bigsummary)
with the following output :
# --bigsummary : flag to extend the summary of this monitor
# return for each failed mon server the list of the
# failed. Like : host1([g1:s1{sum}|s3{sum}][g4:s5{sum}])
...
where g1,g2,... are hostgroups
where s1,s2,... are services
and sum the summary
does it help ?
do you want i mail you directly this release ?
bye
laurent combe
(ps: bonjour gilles!)