> David Nolan wrote:

> That doesn't do what I want.  As far as I can tell remote.monitor loses
all
> the hostgroup/service information.  On the server running remote.monitor
> everything from the remote server would show up in the same
> watchgroup/service.

> I want the master server to inherit the complete information about the
> status of every hostgroup and service, so it can do its own dependency
> checking, and make its own decisions regarding what to alert about.

with remote.monitor (v1.7)
you can use arg called (--bigsummary)

with the following output :

# --bigsummary     : flag to extend the summary of this monitor
#                    return for each failed mon server the list of the
#                    failed. Like : host1([g1:s1{sum}|s3{sum}][g4:s5{sum}])
...

where g1,g2,... are hostgroups
where s1,s2,... are services
and sum the summary

does it help ?
do you want i mail you directly this release ?

bye

laurent combe
(ps: bonjour gilles!)

Reply via email to