Bugs item #1959269, was opened at 2008-05-07 09:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mr-meltdown
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=482468&aid=1959269&group_id=56967
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: PF/runtime
Group: Pathfinder CVS Head
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Wouter Alink (vzzzbx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: XQ+JDBC: protocol violation
Initial Comment:
The MonetDB/XQuery of yesterday seems indeed more stable than the last version.
However, I have difficulty getting the java JDBC driver to work with MonetDB.
We use the JDBC connection extensively in the following way (which works
perfectly with the old backend):
=====================
Connection xqConn =
DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:monetdb://localhost:50000/database?language=xquery",
"monetdb","monetdb");
Statement st = xqConn.createStatement();
ResultSet rs = st.executeQuery("1+1,\"aap\",<noot/>");
try {
rs.next();
if (rs.getLong(1) != 2) fail("failed to receive expected integer");
rs.next();
if (!rs.getString(1).equals("aap")) fail("failed to receive expected
string");
rs.next();
if (!rs.getString(1).equals("<noot/>")) fail("failed to receive
expected element");
} finally {
rs.close();
}
=====================
However, it doesn't work with the new backend, each query gives a "protocol
violated" SQLException.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Fabian (mr-meltdown)
Date: 2008-05-07 10:49
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=963970
Originator: NO
here is the communication log for above example:
RD 1210082838966: read final block: 20 bytes
RX 1210082838966: :mserver:8:plain:LIT
RD 1210082838966: inserting prompt
TD 1210082838966: write final block: 43 bytes
TX 1210082838966: BIG:monetdb:{plain}monetdb:xquery:database:
RD 1210082838968: read final block: 69 bytes
RX 1210082838968: #MonetDB v4 doesn't have multiple database support,
argument
ignored
RD 1210082838968: inserting prompt
TD 1210082838968: write final block: 11 bytes
TX 1210082838968: Xoutput seq
RD 1210082838968: read final block: 0 bytes
RX 1210082838968:
RD 1210082838968: inserting prompt
TD 1210082838996: write final block: 4 bytes
TX 1210082838996: s1+1
RD 1210082839002: read final block: 2 bytes
RX 1210082839002: 2
RD 1210082839002: inserting prompt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Fabian (mr-meltdown)
Date: 2008-05-07 10:45
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=963970
Originator: NO
for the record:
it is a true violation, as the server returns:
2
which is clearly a violation, as it should have been
=2
or
[ 2 ]
or
[ "2" ]
NotMyBug.nl :)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=482468&aid=1959269&group_id=56967
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Monetdb-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-bugs
