Bugs item #2636285, was opened at 2009-02-25 10:00
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tsheyar
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=482468&aid=2636285&group_id=56967
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: PF/runtime
Group: Pathfinder "stable"
>Status: Open
>Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Floris Ouwendijk (floris233)
Assigned to: Peter Boncz (boncz)
Summary: ancestor-or-self: illegal data in size column or context lis
Initial Comment:
An error occurs when running the following query:
doc("test.xml")//properties/../ancestor-or-self::*/name()
The error is:
ERROR = !ERROR: ancestor-or-self: illegal data in size column or context list.
!ERROR: PFll_ancestor_or_self: operation failed.
We're running the daily build of 24 Februari 2009
On startup the server reports:
# MonetDB Server v4.28.0
# based on GDK v1.28.0
# Copyright (c) 1993-July 2008, CWI. All rights reserved.
# Copyright (c) August 2008-, MonetDB B.V.. All rights reserved.
# Compiled for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/64bit with 64bit OIDs; dynamically
linked.
# Visit http://monetdb.cwi.nl/ for further information.
# PF/Tijah module v0.9.0 loaded. http://dbappl.cs.utwente.nl/pftijah
# MonetDB/XQuery module v0.28.0 loaded (default back-end is 'algebra')
The test file is added to the database as
pf:add-doc("/var/dbtransfer/test.xml","test.xml")
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Jan Rittinger (tsheyar)
Date: 2009-04-13 19:28
Message:
Add missing cross reference:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2668437&group_id=56967&atid=482468
Therefore the bug is still not properly fixed---only property check that
makes the query fail is removed.
Stefan can you check whether the problem is still there for the example
query generated with the STABLE pf version (because of the differeing
optimizations there) and the HEAD runtime (as it does not contain the
'fix').
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Floris Ouwendijk (floris233)
Date: 2009-04-10 15:03
Message:
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for the response. Too bad there is no such specific fix.
I'm closing the report.
Floris
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Stefan Manegold (stmane)
Date: 2009-04-09 11:03
Message:
Floris,
I am not consciously are of any fixes particular for this bug report,
which does not mean that there have not been such a fixes.
All I can say is that
(a) it worked for me when I first tried your testcase (as reported),
(b) the test that I added on Apr 2 2009 has been working fine since then
with both the Feb2009 branch and the CVS HEAD; cf., e.g.,
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/testing/projects/monetdb/Stable/pathfinder/.mTestsg103/GNU.64.64.d.1-Fedora8/tests_BugTracker/ancestor-or-self.SF-2636285.unpack_doc.out.00.html
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/testing/projects/monetdb/Stable/pathfinder/.mTestsg103/GNU.64.64.d.1-Fedora8/tests_BugTracker/ancestor-or-self.SF-2636285.unpack_doc.err.00.html
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/testing/projects/monetdb/Current/pathfinder/.mTests103/GNU.64.64.d.1-Fedora8/tests_BugTracker/ancestor-or-self.SF-2636285.unpack_doc.out.00.html
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/testing/projects/monetdb/Current/pathfinder/.mTests103/GNU.64.64.d.1-Fedora8/tests_BugTracker/ancestor-or-self.SF-2636285.unpack_doc.err.00.html
I did not check your test case with any version earlier than I reported
--- I had planned to do so, but didn't have "7zip" available back then, and
no time to get/install it ...
I assume that some of the fixes applied between Feb 25 2009 and the
Feb2009-SP1 release did --- "consciously" or "by coincidence" --- also fix
the problem reported here.
May I conclude from your statement, that it now also works for you?
If so, could you please close this bug report?
Thanks!
Stefan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Floris Ouwendijk (floris233)
Date: 2009-04-09 09:11
Message:
I've tested the attached testcase on MonetDB-Feb2009-SP1, as well as
Stable/.DailyBuilds./0_latest/SourceSuperBall. Can you confirm that this is
not a 'works for me' but that there was an actual fix?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Stefan Manegold (stmane)
Date: 2009-04-02 23:59
Message:
added test in
pathfinder/tests/BugTracker/Tests/ancestor-or-self.SF-2636285.* (Feb2009
branch)
With the Feb2009-SP1, this works fine for me.
Floris,
could you please check, whether it (now) also works for you, and report?
If it works please close this bug report.
Thanks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Floris Ouwendijk (floris233)
Date: 2009-02-25 10:04
Message:
File Added: test.7z
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=482468&aid=2636285&group_id=56967
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
Monetdb-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-bugs
