Feature Requests item #1563499, was opened at 2006-09-22 15:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by stmane
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=482471&aid=1563499&group_id=56967

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Stefan Manegold (stmane)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: TestTools (CWI internal): SF bug report from test results

Initial Comment:
In case testing detects that any tests (incl.
compilation) (of the "public" SF-hosted code) ran
"worse" than the with the previous test run (usually
the previous day/night), the TestTools should (in
addition to sending test result mails) also
automatically file a bug report with SF. 

This bug report should list all tests that "ran worse
than before", provide pointers to the entry page of
packages (MonetDB, sql, pathfinder, etc.) with such
tests, and point out that changes in buildtools and/or
MonetDB might cause failures in sql, pathfinder, etc.
This bug report should either be assigned to one of the
developers that did check in since the last test run or
even be replicated and assigned to each developer that
did check in since the last test run.
In either case, all developers that did check in since
the last test run should be listed to allow
communication among the developers.
Possibly, even a list of all checkins since the last
test run could be added.

Implementing this maily requires some HTML hacking to
fill in the SF bug submission form non-interactively.
All other ingrediens should already be available in the
TestTools code --- at least in some basic version.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Stefan Manegold (stmane)
Date: 2009-06-05 14:05

Message:
I agree that my ambitions with this one were/are too eager --- in fact, the
"error extraction email" that we have for quite some time, now, mostly
serve the purpose of my original intention of more focused and informative
(compilation-) error reporting.
Closing this one.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fabian (mr-meltdown)
Date: 2009-06-04 22:17

Message:
With SF's login mechanism this simply looks like being almost impossible to
me.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fabian (mr-meltdown)
Date: 2006-09-22 15:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=963970

this would result in endless bugs for:
a) known bugs
b) dangling bugs (those who fail today, and don't tomorrow)

Apart from some session related (log-in stuff) difficulties
of TestTools filing bugs, I'd like it when it would just be
able to effectively notify a (group of) user(s) by sending a
targeted mail.  Targetted as in: not +43K mails, that make
it hard to retrieve the actual information.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=482471&aid=1563499&group_id=56967

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OpenSolaris 2009.06 is a cutting edge operating system for enterprises 
looking to deploy the next generation of Solaris that includes the latest 
innovations from Sun and the OpenSource community. Download a copy and 
enjoy capabilities such as Networking, Storage and Virtualization. 
Go to: http://p.sf.net/sfu/opensolaris-get
_______________________________________________
Monetdb-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-bugs

Reply via email to