Bugs item #2893875, was opened at 2009-11-07 17:19
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by stmane
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=482468&aid=2893875&group_id=56967

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: PF/tests
Group: Pathfinder "stable"
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Private: No
Submitted By: Stefan Manegold (stmane)
Assigned to: Peter Boncz (boncz)
>Summary: PF: 82 tests fail on Auf2009_NFI/Nov2009 but work on Aug2009

Initial Comment:
The following 82 tests work(ed) fine with the Aug2009 branch,
but appear to fail with the Aug2009 branch,
and hence most probaly also with the Nov2009 branch
(which is currently even more instable wrt. testing for yet undiscovered 
reasons):

benchmarks/MBench/qa05
benchmarks/MBench/
benchmarks/XBench/DC/MD/q19
benchmarks/XBench/DC/MD/
modules/pftijah/procs
modules/pftijah/colltest1
modules/pftijah/colltest2
modules/pftijah/
runtime/xrpc/admin/add_del_doc_noxrpc
runtime/xrpc/admin/backup_restore_noxrpc
runtime/xrpc/admin/
tests/BugTracker/treat_as.SF-1586454
tests/BugTracker/insert_multiple.SF-1590580
tests/BugTracker/inserting_multiple_elements.SF-1590583
tests/BugTracker/insert_into_transient.SF-1626208
tests/BugTracker/clear_attrs_on_delete.SF-1612739
tests/BugTracker/clear_attrs_on_delete.SF-1612739-b
tests/BugTracker/clear_attrs_on_delete.SF-1612739-c
tests/BugTracker/corrupt_after_update.SF-1706640
tests/BugTracker/accessing_renamed_inserted_deleted_node.SF-1718622-1718635-1718709
tests/BugTracker/insert_large_doc.SF-1726954
tests/BugTracker/replace-corrupts.SF-1758902
tests/BugTracker/swizzle-bug.SF-1760811
tests/BugTracker/swizzle-bug2.SF-1763495
tests/BugTracker/insert_attribute_gives_ERROR_in_merged_union.SF-1763575
tests/BugTracker/immune_for_updates.SF-1766259
tests/BugTracker/repeated-insert.SF-1814911
tests/BugTracker/insert-new-page.SF-1854215
tests/BugTracker/immune_for_updates.SF-1981852
tests/BugTracker/hang_non_existing_doc.SF-1911209
tests/BugTracker/function_parameter_without_type.SF-1898518
tests/BugTracker/copybug.SF-2642003
tests/BugTracker/update-with-timing.SF-2852928
tests/BugTracker/compilation_error.SF-2860574_1
tests/BugTracker/compilation_error.SF-2860574_2
tests/BugsViaSourgeforce/invisible_error_messages.SF-1409122
tests/BugsViaSourgeforce/
tests/StandOff/update/basic_insert
tests/StandOff/update/basic_test
tests/StandOff/update/
tests/Update/setattr-1
tests/Update/insert-1
tests/Update/insert-2
tests/Update/symm
tests/Update/replacevaluetest
tests/Update/replacevaluetest2
tests/Update/update
tests/Update/illegal-insert
tests/Update/illegal-delete
tests/Update/insert_test_order
tests/Update/insert_test_order_seq
tests/Update/replacenode-corruption.SF-2153245
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/AddressBook/Q1x
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/AddressBook/check_docs
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/AddressBook/
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/Parts/Q1
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/Parts/Q2
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/Parts/Q3a1
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/Parts/Q3a2
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/Parts/Q4a
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/Parts/Q4ax
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/Parts/Q4b
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/Parts/Q4bx
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/Parts/Q4c
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/Parts/Q4cx
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/Parts/Q6
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/Parts/Q6x
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/Parts/
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/R/Q1
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/R/Q2
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/R/Q3
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/R/Q4
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/R/Q4x
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/R/Q5b
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/R/Q6a
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/R/Q6b
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/R/Q7
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/R/Q7x
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/R/Q8
tests/W3C_use_cases/XQUF/R/Q9
tests/XQuery/is-before4
tests/XQuery/union


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Stefan Manegold (stmane)
Date: 2009-11-08 18:13

Message:
The same test that fail with Aug2009_NFI, while working with Aug2009,
indeed also fail with Nov2009.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Stefan Manegold (stmane)
Date: 2009-11-08 16:50

Message:
For completeness:

I checked this on my 64-bit Fedora 10 Linux desktop, using a "testing"
build of MonetDB, i.e., configured with --disbale-debug --enable-optimize
--enable-assert .

I ran Mtest.py (more precisely make check, respectively RunMtest in the
build directory) seperately for the Aug2009 and the Aug2009_NFI brach
(builds) of pathfinder, collected the console output in files, and run diff
over those (as well as over the times.sql files that Mtest.py creates in
its <TSTTRGBASE> directory.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=482468&aid=2893875&group_id=56967

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Monetdb-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-bugs

Reply via email to