Stefan Manegold wrote: > Romulo, Stratos, et al, > > I think, crackers should stay as a feature also in the release. > > However, I do agree that compilation is an issue --- (though possibly not > totally wrong,) "the disciple learned from the master" is no "excuse" ... > ;-) > Hence, we should have a very close look at the code and try to > reduce/condense the code base if/where possible, and/or break it up into > multiple files to speed-up compilation. > > Given other priorities and obligations, this will most probabaly only happen > after upcoming deadlines, and hence after the upcoming release ... It seems I need to do it locally... I mean remove crackers, not reduce/condense code ;)
Romulo > > Good night, > > Stefan > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:35:54AM +0200, Romulo Goncalves wrote: >> Lately I had to compile the stable branch several times in the optimized >> mode. >> Crackers is not a feature to be used in the stable branch, so why do we >> have crackers there? Its compilation takes too long. >> >> Could we remove it? >> Stratos you are the one who should decide... ;) >> >> Thanks, >> Romulo >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. >> It's the best place to buy or sell services for >> just about anything Open Source. >> http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php >> _______________________________________________ >> Monetdb-developers mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Monetdb-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers
