On 20-11-2011 09:50:31 +0100, luca paganotti wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Fabian Groffen <[1]fabian.grof...@cwi.nl>
> wrote:
>> We prefer bindings to be written in the language itself, as much as
>> possible.  I'm almost sure wrapping the MAPI C-API in Eiffel will result
>> in something foreign to the language (if you can figure out pre and post
>> conditions anyway).
> 
> the intermediate results of an eiffel system build are c source files, then
> to have the final results you use a C compiler, I don't see any language
> mismatch.

Sure, but mapping each C function into a C-wrapper for Eiffel will make
a mess.  Swig is a well known example of that.

I would more expect something like:
http://archive.eiffel.com/products/store.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Monetdb-developers mailing list
Monetdb-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers

Reply via email to