On 20-11-2011 09:50:31 +0100, luca paganotti wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Fabian Groffen <[1]fabian.grof...@cwi.nl> > wrote: >> We prefer bindings to be written in the language itself, as much as >> possible. I'm almost sure wrapping the MAPI C-API in Eiffel will result >> in something foreign to the language (if you can figure out pre and post >> conditions anyway). > > the intermediate results of an eiffel system build are c source files, then > to have the final results you use a C compiler, I don't see any language > mismatch.
Sure, but mapping each C function into a C-wrapper for Eiffel will make a mess. Swig is a well known example of that. I would more expect something like: http://archive.eiffel.com/products/store.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________ Monetdb-developers mailing list Monetdb-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers