Niels, On 16-05-2012 22:49:30 +0200, Niels Nes wrote: > Changeset: f450300984b8 for MonetDB > URL: http://dev.monetdb.org/hg/MonetDB?cmd=changeset;node=f450300984b8
> @@ -20,12 +20,12 @@ Ready. > > % . # table_name > % single_value # name > -% char # type > +% any # type > % 0 # length > [ NULL ] If the "any" type now boils up to the clients, we need to fix/change the APIs too, to understand this type and in some cases do something sensical with it. JDBC will barf on it currently, IIRC. Would it be possible to use an existing type for NULL when it has no type at the stage where it is sent back to the client (like exportResult)? Fabian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ Monetdb-developers mailing list Monetdb-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers
