I was under the impression that it wasn't portable. If it is, that would be great.
Evan On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Tony Arcieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Kirk Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Linux (and some other *nixes), there's a funky little thing that >> happens when a process that is bound to a socket is forked. >> >> All of the forked processes are also bound to the socket, and the >> kernel will distribute connections between them. It's a low cost way >> to load balance between workers on a machine that is running an OS >> which will support it. > > Prefork servers should be fairly portable. Any reason why you aren't trying > this on other platforms? > > -- > Tony Arcieri > medioh.com > > _______________________________________________ > Mongrel-development mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-development > > -- Evan Weaver _______________________________________________ Mongrel-development mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-development
