Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote: > Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ezra Zygmuntowicz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Seems to work as advertised so far, cool stuff ;) One suggestion, folks > > > are pretty standardized on rack and config.ru files these days. I'd much > > > rather see unicorn look for a APP_ROOT/config.ru to load as its config > > > file rather then the eval that returns a hash style it uses now. > > > > Ezra, thanks for testing and feedback. Good point about config.ru, > > I'll try to make that change hopefully today to make it easier to > > migrate from existing Rack apps. > > I just pushed out the following changes. > > * revamp configuration with Configurator DSL > * Replace unicorn binary with something rackup-like > * GNUMakefile: revamp for parallel 1.8/1.9 runs > * test_exec: fix for temporary files not being cleaned > * Fix+test reexec error handling on bad inputs
<snip> > Basically the latest push includes config.ru compatibility and new test > cases in test/exec/test_exec.rb for binary reexecution, listener > inheritance, and reloading config files (even bad ones). > > This new config stuff is completely untested for any real apps and I'll > need to update the examples soonish. But the new test cases pass in > both 1.9.1 and 1.8.7, which is a good sign. Help... I'm basically a very confused person and I'm having trouble deciding on how/if config.ru should deal with the config file for Unicorn-specific settings. Or if the Unicorn-specific config file should be allowed to specify/override config.ru... Any ideas would be greatly appreciated, thanks! -- Eric Wong _______________________________________________ Mongrel-development mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-development
