I think we should call this version 1.2, but that's the least of our concerns.
I have a 1.2 branch in fauna but I don't know what's in it anymore...will audit. Evan On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Evan Weaver<[email protected]> wrote: > http://github.com/fauna/mongrel/tree/spinoff > > Ragel 6.5 builds, and tests pass on 1.8 and 1.9, except for: > > test_deflate(HandlersTest): > Zlib::DataError: incorrect header check > /Volumes/Projects/fauna/mongrel/test/test_handlers.rb:109:in > `block in test_deflate' > > Which I don't understand right now. > > Go nuts with the packaging; I'm still not sure what you're trying to > accomplish exactly. > > Evan > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Luis Lavena<[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Evan Weaver<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Ugh, sorry. Mongrel is not dead, but rather severely neglected by me. >>> >> >> And me. Been focusing a lot on RubyInstaller and the related tools. >> >>> We still use it at Twitter, for what it's worth. I will gather up the >>> 1.9 bits I have and send you the details. >>> >> >> Cool, you know my email already ;-) >> >>> What cross-compilation strategy did you want to use for MinGW? >>> >> >> rake-compiler and fat binaries: >> >> http://github.com/luislavena/rake-compiler/tree/ >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Luis Lavena >> AREA 17 >> - >> Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, >> but rather when there is nothing more to take away. >> Antoine de Saint-Exupéry >> _______________________________________________ >> Mongrel-development mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-development >> > > > > -- > Evan Weaver > -- Evan Weaver _______________________________________________ Mongrel-development mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-development
