Luis Lavena <[email protected]> wrote: > * Faster release cycles. > > Let's get serious. There was no release of Mongrel itself in the past > YEAR. We all know Mongrel *is* stable, but things can get obsolete > pretty easily in the software industry. > > I still use Mongrel on Windows for development and still deploy to > Linux servers running it, or Windows intranets using mongrel_service. > > While some people had migrated to Passenger, there is still lot of > value on Mongrel itself.
Just another data point, some applications I deal with has been using the latest Mongrel SVN trunk revisions for well over a year now. Heck, it works even so well that nobody (besides myself) is even remotely interested in even trying them on anything else. -- Eric Wong _______________________________________________ Mongrel-development mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-development
