I'm OK. mongrel_service do not fall into Mongrel's licensing I believe.
Also, since is a gem plugin, do not need to comply with GPL licensing, correct? If that is the case, then yes, no complains from me. If that is not the case, then you have my complain. mongrel_service uses a library created by myself which is MIT, by turning mongrel and mongrel_service into GPL, could affect my usage of this library in other projects. Just saying. Licensing sucks. On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, you're being Cc:-ed on this email because you've contributed > to the Mongrel or Unicorn code base at some point. > > I would like to add the GPLv3 to the existing Unicorn license, making it > (Ruby terms|GPLv2|GPLv3). Furthermore, I'd like the project leader of > Unicorn (currently me) to be given the option to add future versions of > the GPL (as published by the Free Software Foundation) to the license. > > I'm /not/ asking for a "GPLv2 or later" clause since that would give the > FSF too much power for GPLv4. > > The original request to Zed Shaw and Evan Weaver is here: > http://mid.gmane.org/[email protected] > > Besides myself, Zed Shaw and Evan Weaver have the largest amount of code > in Unicorn, and both have OK-ed the addition of the GPLv3, so I hope you > do the same. > > Thank you. > > -- > Eric Wong > -- Luis Lavena AREA 17 - Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but rather when there is nothing more to take away. Antoine de Saint-Exupéry _______________________________________________ Unicorn mailing list - [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-unicorn Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying
