Nokan Emiro <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for your answer Eric. > > > Using Rack::Timeout with Rainbows! instead of unicorn is probably a > > better idea. > > 99% of the requests are fast and can be served far below 300 ms. Only > a few type of requests need to stream lots of data. Do you really think that > unicorn isn't a good choice in this case and I should consider switching to > something else (Rack::Timeout + Rainbows!, Puma or whatever) just for the > sake of that 1%?
What Hongli said. unicorn is only for sending fast responses. You'll run into scalability problems very quickly if unicorn is used for any slow response. _______________________________________________ Unicorn mailing list - [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-unicorn Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying
