On 11.12.2013 15.54, Michael Fischer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Petteri Räty <betelge...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> At least for pid based monitoring tools it is (I do agree with others >> that you should also be monitoring http though). For example monit >> requires that you give it a pid file. Why is it wrong for them to point >> to the same pid? > > Monit doesn't require a pid, never has: > > http://mmonit.com/monit/documentation/monit.html#connection_testing >
If you only want to do connection testing. What if you want to monitor the memory usage of unicorn processes? > To answer your question, though, the reason the pid files must contain > different PIDs is that the two processes (previous and > current-generation masters) have different PIDs. And some of us do > care that they differ :) > Eric's original comment and my response was about the pid files having the same content (albeit shortly). Regards, Petteri _______________________________________________ Unicorn mailing list - mongrel-unicorn@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-unicorn Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying
