On 8/25/06, Zed Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 20:08 -0400, Ross Singer wrote:
> Zed,
>
> Thanks for getting back to me on this.
>
> Here is the log from the offending request:
>
<snip>
> Is this what you were looking for?

Yep I'll look at that.  But right from the RFC you have this:

unsafe = (CTL | " " | "\"" | "#" | "%" | "<" | ">");

Even they label that as "unsafe" so I'm going to be hard pressed to
allow this in.

Again, I wouldn't say I'm opposed to this. :)

All I'm sayin'  "Real World Scenario".  Also "85% browser market share".

I can probably talk EBSCO into fixing their bad URLs, but I don't have any control over Internet Explorer or Microsoft.  I've got no influence there.

I'm not trying to be passive-aggressive at all about this (I really want to stress that), I'm just stating that this is something that's bound to come up again.

Because IE sucks.  I guess Safari does too.

But good lord a lot people use them.

-Ross.


--
Zed A. Shaw
http://www.zedshaw.com/
http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/
http://www.lingr.com/room/3yXhqKbfPy8 -- Come get help.

_______________________________________________
Mongrel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users

_______________________________________________
Mongrel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users

Reply via email to