On 10/15/06, philippe lachaise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> You could probably write a mongrel handler to cuddle with the params. > > Aren't people likely to blame it on Mongrel, even if it is most unfair ? > > The usual conclusion is "this server can't handle that". > > My gut feeling is that a web server should handle gracefully ill-behaved > clients or complain explicitely. > > (But, since I'm not the one who can write the code, take my remark as a mere > whisper ;-)
That's up to Zed I guess. But, a plugin serves many purposes: - lets you get on with your life since you don't have to wait for a new release - lets others on older versions of mongrel easily upgrade - provides Zed with working code (hopefully) being used in production. i'm sure that says a lot more than a feature request. As much as I dislike the notion, I too think Mongrel should handle this stuff. -- Rick Olson http://weblog.techno-weenie.net http://mephistoblog.com _______________________________________________ Mongrel-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
