On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:25:43PM -0700, Zed A. Shaw wrote: > On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:38:15 +0200 > Jacob Atzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 06:43:03PM -0700, Zed A. Shaw wrote: > > > > Maybe I don't understand what is meant by pre-release, but I have a few > > issues: > > > > - If a bugfix is needed for 0.4.0 what would it be called? 0.4.1 does > > not seem to be a possibility as it may already have been released as > > pre-release to 0.5. > > > > The idea is that I want to get toward 1.0 for the final production > stable release. Many people have said that it's mostly 1.0 quality > for them and it'd be an easier sell if I just labeled it that. Rather > than just pull a Subversion team manuever and call 0.3.3.245 the "1.0" > version on a magic release, I'm going to shorten the version number. > > So, in short a bugfix will just be 0.5. That's it. When we hit 1.0 > the scheme will change.
In that case my issues are without merit. Btw. I like the idea of numbering the pre-releases. It's been kinda messy to tell which pre-release one was using previously. -- Thanks, - Jacob Atzen _______________________________________________ Mongrel-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
