On 1/15/07, Chad Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll point this thread out to the RubyGems list, I'm curious what they > would have to say. At a minimum, I think the RubyGems versioning > standard docs could use some clarification.
I imagine that what is said will reduce down to something like this: "Provide a patch that retains the ability to selectively require certain versions or version ranges, yet provides the version specification freedom that you think should exist, and we'll consider it." Kirk Haines _______________________________________________ Mongrel-users mailing list Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
