Hello all, The following change to Mongrel::HttpRequest:
def read_socket(len)
if [EMAIL PROTECTED]
data = @socket.recv(len) # <--- formerly @socket.read(len)
if !data
raise "Socket read return nil"
elsif data.length != len
raise "Socket read returned insufficient data: #{data.length}"
else
data
end
else
raise "Socket already closed when reading."
end
end
seems to work for me, and vastly improves the speed of the body
processing (quick tests reveal that using IO#read takes about 1 min 40
secs. and using Socket#recv takes about 9 secs on an 8.5 mb file). I
have been having trouble discovering the difference between read &
recv (I am not a socket developer by any means). Can anybody tell me
what sort of safety one loses by doing this with recv instead of read?
Thanks.
best,
Erik Hetzner
pgpT9YCLDTmZG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Mongrel-users mailing list Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
