Zed A. Shaw wrote: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 15:12:01 +0200 > Chris Taggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Update on what I've tried/found out so far. >> >> http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pHDcT1cywdrovBLlL7QV8Ow > > What's funny is I've been stuggling with JRuby Rails applications > running under *any* application server requring 2G (yes gigabytes) of > RAM just to function. Many times we'd have to do complete restarts > about 1 or 2 times a week. > > So it's strange to hear someone say that 120M is too much. :-) > > -- > Zed A. Shaw > - Hate: http://savingtheinternetwithhate.com/ > - Good: http://www.zedshaw.com/ > - Evil: http://yearofevil.com/
The problem isn't 120M -- but that it seems to keep climbing until much instability ensues... That's possibly a leak, but I'm still a bit confused as to why the 64-bit server is using so much more... and whether I should maybe run the mongrel_cluster instances on 32-bit kernel (assuming that's possible). -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ Mongrel-users mailing list Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
