A good question. Originally most people used Camping with ActiveRecord in its default non-concurrent mode, so that's probably why. It should perhaps be removed.
Or is there some interaction problem with the Camping reloader? Evan On Nov 11, 2007 12:54 AM, Zach Moazeni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why is the camping handler using Mutex#synchronize to serve requests? > I was under the impression that camping was considered more thread > safe than Rails? > > -Zach > _______________________________________________ > Mongrel-users mailing list > Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users > -- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC _______________________________________________ Mongrel-users mailing list Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
