Hello, I just wanted to tell the list that I've spent some time to optimize my code a little, I've reworked some SQL queries, removed some part of Rails I wasn't using ... Now, both mongrel processes are stable at 150Mb each.
T. On Nov 5, 2007 7:27 PM, Thomas Balthazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/5/07, Steve Midgley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 09:17 AM 11/5/2007, you wrote: > > > > Which kink of issues with my code could use that much memory? > > > > If I load lots of records with Active Records, aren't they > > > "unloaded" at > > > > some times? > > > > > >Does your code or any of those pluginx use Array#shift? There was a > > >bug with Array#shift which still existed in 1.8.5 which basically left > > >stuff inside the array data structure after a shift, so that those > > >things didn't get GCd when they should have. It's a sneaky bug that > > >can easily eat a lot of memory. > > > > > >Otherwise, can you start a test instance of your application, and then > > >test it to see if there are certain actions which cause the memory > > >growth. That would help you pinpoint where the likely problems are. > > >Just use ab or httperf to send a large number of requests to specific > > >urls in your app, and see how ram usage changes as you do that. > > > > > > > > >Kirk Haines > > > > Thanks Kirk - I guess I'm totally OT at this point, but I hadn't heard > > about this bug before. From your description this is a specific problem > > to the underlying C code implementing shift, which is not found in > > related functions? So "array.slice!(0)" would be identical in function > > to shift but not contain this leak? > > > > Thanks again, > > > > Steve > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mongrel-users mailing list > > Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users > > > > Hello, > > Thanks everybody for all those informations. > I'll make some tests and I'll keep you posted. > I won't have the time to run those tests this week, but I won't forget > to post the results on the list. > > Best, > Thomas. > _______________________________________________ Mongrel-users mailing list Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
